The following question arise in real practice of scientific work in a not enough experienced researcher: should the statistics on a medical dissertation be calculated and described “as it is correct” or “as usually”?
- To be honest, it is only necessary to calculate and describe statistics based on the data of medical research, including the dissertation, correctly (contact us – we will teach you how).
And prepare the “raw” data so that any other researcher in the world can use it (it’s very simple, write to us – we’ll send an Excel file template where everything is already made).
Thus, your work will have a chance to perform a positive impact on the development of medical technologies for diagnosis, treatment, prevention.
- If the data is not true (or you are at least somewhat unsure of its accuracy), if falsification or fabrication of data was committed, it is better not to publish it at all. And if you have to publish – then do it in the worst possible way.
In other words, in this case it is better to calculate and describe “as usually” (“anyhow”, “as someone said”, etc.).
Then it will be easier for specialists to determine that the corresponding publication is a “slag”, they will filter it out, will not take it into account when developing standards of medical care, and there will be less risk of a potential negative impact on medical decisions.
Contact us, we will help you to formulate the description so that “both the wolves are fed and the sheep are safe” – that is so that everything would be “dissertationable”, and chances of a disorienting influence on real medical practice and theory would be reduced.
Ask in the comments or write a private message.
Register on http://kalmykov.info and any convenient channel for information distribution from this site (see the links), we share many useful things here:
- for PhD students, applicants for a scientific degree (“dissentants”) in medicine, researchers, scientific leaders (consultants), organizers of scientific activities in medicine (vice-rectors and deputy directors for scientific work, scientific secretaries). For a medical thesis, we have even specially developed a whole curriculum “Kamasutra for a dissertation: methodology for mastering a degree. How to take with pleasure”, in addition to its popular version, there are adaptations for academic needs – for example, for integration into the educational program of graduate school;
• deep analysis of literature data;
• competent organization and conduction of your own research;
• correct estimation of obtained data;
• full aprobation and reflection of the results of work in publications;
• rational development of invention and patent registration;
• full presentation of the results in the forms of a report, dissertation, monograph etc.
… and also:
- for medical practitioners (doctors, nurses) and medical students – scientific consulting, PR and marketing; training and information support (reference and educational information; collegial boards and consultations; training, employment in the country of residence and abroad; certification; medical language translations, etc.);
- for managing owners and heads of medical business, and medical enterprises of various forms of ownership (assistance in the optimization and development of an enterprise, attracting investments, etc.);
- for investors and investing owners of the medical business (audit, examination and preparation, execution, optimization of investment projects in a form convenient for investment);
- for anyone interested – medical consultation (medical troubleshooting, medical coaching), assistance in solving any medical problems;
- for socially active people – social events within the framework of our “Medical Scientific Club”, “Association of Evidence-Based Medicine”.
… true scientific idea is unlimited,
it doesn’t have any racial or national, gender or political etc. attributes;
and it does not matter where you live –
we can collaborate …